<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>lighty's life: Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c</title>
    <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As part of a weekend project I&amp;#8217;m ripping 1.5 apart a bit. I worked with glib for quite some time now and feel the need to replace the base-structures around &amp;#8220;buffer&amp;#8221; (strings) and &amp;#8220;array&amp;#8221; (hash) apart and replace it with the glib counter-parts.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;To make this a nice experience and that I don&amp;#8217;t harm anyone else I imported trunk into a local bzr tree:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;bzr clone svn://svn.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;to clone the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SVN&lt;/span&gt; tree.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#8217;s see how well that experiment goes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2d7a3d7e-eac2-4753-8a2a-161cf46f615d</guid>
      <author>jan</author>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c</link>
      <category>lighttpd</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/trackback/4850</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Jan Kneschke</title>
      <description>I have no idea if it will be faster or slower. For sure it will be a good cleanup and make the code nicer to work with.

To clone with bzr, remove the svn@ to get anonymous clones.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c26682fe-096f-443f-9c86-538d45f7400c</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4882</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Emanuele Aina</title>
      <description>I've tried to clone the bzr repo, but it keeps asking for the password  to open the ssh connection.

Can you publish it in a way that one can do an anonymous clone to experiment?

Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c059c0b8-cc95-49af-b1de-c20ce6d4a2ad</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4873</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Jan (the other one)</title>
      <description>I'm excited if it speeds up lighty a bit. Perhaps it's like spring cleaning the code :)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:7b7e934d-b0b6-4670-9e3a-f44bb35d4164</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4872</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Viktor</title>
      <description>This is great! I have been looking to speed up the system. Could you update if you've tested this more? I am all for glib!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:bef78f58-b4b7-406f-90ac-f15a3592986f</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4871</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Scott Johnson</title>
      <description>Wow, this sounds like a nice refactoring.  Are you noticing speed improvements?  Or is this just making the code cleaner?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:15468b4d-4d1b-4e22-842b-bb48f198c0fe</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4863</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Tim</title>
      <description>OMG - An update!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:529b6c7a-8cb7-4a4c-963f-d636a286c439</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4855</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Paolo Gabrielli</title>
      <description>Sounds nice, especially in the hope that the Glib implementation is optimized from the speed's point of view, as it should be, even if the performance improvs are small.
Many thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:92a6a710-8e93-4bca-befc-67fc0510790d</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4853</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Weekend Projects: killing buffer.c and array.c" by Bert JW Regeer</title>
      <description>s/close/clone/</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2b28cd57-33fa-477d-82a8-672c4e0e04e2</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2008/02/09/weekend-projects-killing-buffer-c-and-array-c#comment-4852</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
