<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>lighty's life: Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites</title>
    <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Reading the last statistics from &lt;a href="http://survey.netcraft.com/Reports/0612/"&gt;netcraft&amp;#8217;s Webserver Survey&lt;/a&gt; lighttpd is &lt;b&gt;#12&lt;/b&gt; of the most used webserver software packages.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;But who is running lighttpd and for what purpose ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;The Ranking&lt;/h3&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?ts_mode=global&amp;#38;lang=none"&gt;Alexa Global Top 500&lt;/a&gt; lists a few sites which are already known from &lt;a href="http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/PoweredByLighttpd"&gt;PoweredByLighttpd&lt;/a&gt; in our &lt;a href="http://wiki.lighttpd.net/"&gt;wiki&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;#6&lt;/b&gt; is &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/"&gt;youtube&lt;/a&gt; who is using lighttpd for sending out the static content (the images, the videos, ...). They use a patched version which handles their load better.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;#12&lt;/b&gt; is wikipedia. If you open &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href="http://getfirebug.com/"&gt;firebug&lt;/a&gt; and check the &amp;#8220;All-&amp;gt;Net&amp;#8221; tab, you will see &lt;kbd&gt;upload.wikimedia.org&lt;/kbd&gt;. All the images-work is handed here: thumbnail generation, delivery.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;#49&lt;/b&gt; is &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/"&gt;imageshack.us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sf.net/"&gt;SourceForge.net&lt;/a&gt; is at &lt;b&gt;#80&lt;/b&gt;. The whole site runs on lighttpd. Dynamic content via &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PHP&lt;/span&gt; and the usual static content.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;#132&lt;/b&gt; is &lt;a href="http://sendspace.com/"&gt;sendspace.com&lt;/a&gt; a huge file-sharing site. They care a lot about concurrent access to a large set of large files. You don&amp;#8217;t want to hear their disk-backends seeking. :)&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;On &lt;b&gt;#221&lt;/b&gt; we have our first brother from the family of torrent sites: &lt;a href="http://mininova.org"&gt;mininova.org&lt;/a&gt; They are a long running lighttpd user and are leading the group:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://isohunt.com/"&gt;isohunt.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.torrentreactor.to/"&gt;torrentreactor.to&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.animersion.net/"&gt;animersion.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.torrents.md/"&gt;torrents.md&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://torrentz.com/"&gt;torrentz.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;... and those were just the ones I could find right away. :)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h3&gt;The Numbers&lt;/h3&gt;
The December Survey from Netcraft talks about &lt;b&gt;178,619&lt;/b&gt; detected servers. I know that quite a few of them are domain-hosters which are using a single IP to park a few thousand domain-names.

&lt;h3&gt;The Others&lt;/h3&gt;
But who is behind those numbers ? I have contact to a some of owners of the sites mentioned above and want to write an article about the different users of lighttpd. How they are using it, what they would like to see, what they love, ... If you are interested and are listed in Alexa before &lt;a href="http://jan.kneschke.de/"&gt;my personal site&lt;/a&gt; drop me a mail at &lt;a href="mailto:jan@kneschke.de"&gt;jan@kneschke.de&lt;/a&gt; or just add a comment with your mail-address below.

	&lt;p&gt;And who is on place &lt;a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=lighttpd.net"&gt;#15,276&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2d80a243-ee69-493f-be98-60226b011fcc</guid>
      <author>jan</author>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites</link>
      <category>lighttpd</category>
      <category>alexa</category>
      <category>netcraft</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/trackback/2619</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by GreenJolly</title>
      <description>Torrent sites are very popular now, and they are the global problem for providers with heavy bandwidth.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:41:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:2b265161-126e-4cf3-8b4f-3fca3f48bb58</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-3236</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by Torrent sites in top list</title>
      <description>torrent sires in top lists.
that's unexpected. 

</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:07:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:089da85e-a57a-4bee-9caa-e49b74917ca2</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-3233</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by servertweak.com</title>
      <description>Re meirab's comment.

I can't see why you can't, putting all of the files into a NAS file storage system and have lighty on different servers connect to the NAS server isn't that hard is it? However I'd be more worried about the harddrive throughput if your talking about serving static files over a number of servers. The amount of CPU lighty consumes is next to nothing.

Raiding all servers and having a syncing cron sync all of the servers at once can also work =)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:08:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:73821a63-ca2b-4a3e-bf29-70196edd91c7</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-3226</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by meirab@bigfoot.com</title>
      <description>i read that " Lighttpd powers 5 Alexa Top 250 sites 10 "

i don't know how can "Lighttpd" do it from 1 webserver, i believe that big sites need some way of parallel web serving in order to serve many web connections at once.

can "Lighttpd" be installed over multiple webservers and act as one site?

or multiple "Lighttpd" webservers can be connected with an application sever (iron) like the ones from: F5 or RADWARE?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:51:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:eaf62cf8-21c9-4c4c-8bf2-587e35feaf3b</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-3215</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by MasalaGuru (NSFW)</title>
      <description>We started using lighty as a proxy behind apache after the big brother gave up trying to serve all those images and flv's.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:27:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:273e91e6-0296-440e-b30b-d42fe166dcbe</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-3212</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by Andre Bogus</title>
      <description>fxn: They will have their reasons. My guess: 1. the advantage of streaming grows with file size - the snippets YouTube serves are usually not huge. 2. streaming is not supported with all clients.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:02:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:fad4839e-b7f6-4d78-8baa-86e2b4d4320c</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2678</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by fxn</title>
      <description>So, if serving videos without streaming is fine for a site such as YouTube, when is streaming worthwile for static content? Isn't streaming theoretically better?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:31:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f09b86fc-c1dc-4473-887e-de6b4331e60f</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2671</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by Paul</title>
      <description>I believe &lt;a href="http://penny-arcade.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://penny-arcade.com&lt;/a&gt; uses you guys as well to run an RoR app.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:05:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:0d5463d2-05da-496b-96bf-24a163a29b43</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2666</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by Jan Kneschke</title>
      <description>They simply push it out.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:57:21 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:dddef8b0-19ab-4314-93f8-5b12129aa221</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2664</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by YouTube</title>
      <description>Do they use the FLV streamer or do they simply send videos?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:38:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:6b784c75-2024-44d7-808d-0963dbd088ea</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2663</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by Jan Kneschke</title>
      <description>CC, right. I fixed that.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:35:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e474d53e-c240-4688-b032-9e20085dd458</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2662</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by cc</title>
      <description>Are you sure that's mininova.com? They look scammy. You probably meant mininova.org.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:49:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:3786c651-1c7a-493f-90f1-af2f18b21c6b</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2661</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by http://www.bubbleshare.com/</title>
      <description>Congratulations.

We use and LOVE Lighty at BubbleShare. We serve both static content (images) as well as our Rails app from it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:39:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:a4ef2ac9-7cf8-4cd8-b134-05544fb01421</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2659</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Lighttpd powers 6 Alexa Top 250 sites" by http://www.bubbleshare.com/</title>
      <description>Congratulations.

We use and LOVE Lighty at BubbleShare. We serve both static content (images) as well as our Rails app from it.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:39:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:e99de8c2-eb85-45b4-b8db-e9f18d11eeca</guid>
      <link>http://blog.lighttpd.net/articles/2006/12/28/lighttpd-powers-5-alexa-top-250-sites#comment-2660</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
